TL;DR Florida is the most concentrated MCA broker market in the country and has the second-strongest homestead protection. It also has the worst-translated boilerplate defense content of any state. Here's what's actually true if you operate in Florida.
1. Florida Ch. 687 is more relevant than the boilerplate says
Florida's criminal-usury cap is 25% and civil cap is 18% (Ch. 687). Many defense pages dismiss usury arguments on the ground that MCAs are sales rather than loans. Whether Ch. 687 bears on a given contract is a legal question, and where it can become relevant is when a contract structurally fails the sale-versus-loan test (no reconciliation, accelerated on bankruptcy, fixed term). Florida state courts have at times been more willing than New York's to consider recharacterization. Whether a given contract crosses that line, and how a particular Florida judge is likely to view it, is a legal question for a licensed Florida attorney. For Delancey Street as a settlement firm, the practical point is simpler: a contract with loan-like structure tends to be priced differently in commercial negotiation than a clean revenue-purchase agreement.
2. Article X creates an unlimited homestead and a different PG calculation
Florida's Article X, § 4 protects the homestead with no value cap (up to half-acre urban, 160 acres rural). Like Texas, this changes the personal-guaranty enforcement math. Funders aware of Florida homestead protection often price files lower at settlement than they would for a non-homesteaded owner. Most defense pages mention homestead only in passing. The settlement framing Delancey Street works with is "what is realistically collectible after the homestead is accounted for, and let's settle the contract balance accordingly." That is not a legal argument or legal advice; it is a commercial conversation informed by how Florida property law generally works.
3. Post-Yellowstone, South Florida is a different broker market
The 2022-2024 Yellowstone Capital litigation cycle reshaped the South Florida MCA industry. Many brokers that operated under Yellowstone's umbrella migrated to new aggregator names in Miami-Dade and Broward. Contracts coming out of post-Yellowstone shops have often been redrafted to clear LG Funding-style recharacterization tests, but their collection practices are sometimes the same as before. Some are aggressive enough to raise questions under the Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act (FCCPA, § 559.72). Whether that statute applies to a particular commercial situation is a legal question for an attorney; Delancey Street simply notes that the issue comes up more often than most defense pages suggest, and a licensed Florida lawyer is the right person to evaluate it.
4. Sunbiz transparency is leverage you can't get in most states
Florida's Sunbiz corporate registry and UCC filing system is one of the most accessible in the country. Pre-engagement, Delancey Street can pull every UCC-1 filed against a Florida merchant in minutes and reconcile it against the funder list the merchant gives us. We have found "ghost" UCC filings, funders the merchant forgot about or assumed were terminated, within hours of intake. This is a workout and diligence step, not legal work, but it changes the negotiation sequence entirely.
5. Florida has unusually strict UPL enforcement, which shapes who does the court work
Florida's unauthorized-practice-of-law enforcement is among the most aggressive in the country. Out-of-state attorneys representing Florida merchants on Florida collection actions need careful licensing arrangements, and a settlement firm like Delancey Street does not practice law in Florida or anywhere else. The appropriate path for a Florida merchant who needs litigation handled is a licensed Florida attorney, retained directly by the merchant. Delancey Street handles the commercial negotiation and can refer independent Florida counsel; the attorney-client relationship is between the merchant and that attorney. Many "national MCA defense" landing pages do not disclose this distinction.
6. The 11th Circuit on recharacterization differs from the 2nd
The 11th Circuit has not adopted the LG Funding framework wholesale, and Florida federal courts have at times had more analytical room on recharacterization than 2nd Circuit courts. Funder counsel is aware of this. Whether a particular dispute is better positioned in Florida state court or in federal court, including any question of removal, is a legal-strategy decision that belongs to a licensed Florida attorney evaluating that specific file. It is not something a settlement firm decides or advises on. Delancey Street raises the point only so a merchant knows it is a real question to ask independent counsel.
Florida is a state where leverage hides in the property law (homestead), the corporate registry (Sunbiz), and the federal circuit's posture on recharacterization. Much of the work that matters in a workout happens before a complaint is filed. When an engagement needs Florida-licensed litigation, an independent Florida attorney is the right call, and Delancey Street can refer one.