Can You Sue Your MCA Company: When Litigation Makes Sense

The default mindset for merchants in trouble with a cash advance funder is defensive. The funder will sue, freeze accounts, file UCC notices, and you will react. But there is a smaller, less obvious category of cases where the merchant should flip the script and file first. Done right, an affirmative claim can rewrite the entire negotiation.

When the Math Says You Were Loaned, Not Bought

A true MCA is a purchase of future receivables. A loan is a fixed-payment, fixed-term debt. New York and several other states draw the line by looking at three factors: whether the reconciliation provision is real, whether the term is finite, and who bears the risk of business failure.

If your contract has a daily ACH that never adjusts to actual revenue, a finite repayment term with no good-faith reconciliation, and a personal guarantee that holds you liable even if the business closes, you may not have an MCA at all. You may have a loan, and the effective APR is frequently 80, 150, or even 400 percent.

At those numbers, you are likely past the criminal usury threshold in New York (25 percent) and well past the civil cap. An independent attorney can file a declaratory judgment action asking the court to recharacterize the transaction as a usurious loan, which under New York law is void and unenforceable.

RICO and the Federal Hook

In the most extreme cases, courts have allowed civil RICO claims to proceed against MCA funders. The theory: a pattern of usurious lending across multiple merchants, combined with mail or wire fraud (electronic ACH pulls, misleading written disclosures), constitutes racketeering activity under 18 U.S.C. § 1962.

RICO is hard. Treble damages and attorneys’ fees are real motivators, but courts dismiss most attempts. The engagements that survive usually involve documented misrepresentations, coordinated networks of funders sharing merchant data, and clear evidence of usury masked as receivables purchase.

State Law Claims That Actually Settle

Most affirmative cases that produce results are not RICO. They are simpler state-law claims: deceptive trade practices, fraud, breach of the reconciliation provision, tortious interference with customers when the funder sent improper UCC notices to your AR.

The settlement leverage comes from discovery. Once you are the plaintiff, you get to depose the funder’s underwriting team, see internal communications, see what they told other merchants, and see the spread between their stated purchase price and the cash they actually paid. That discovery often produces evidence the funder would pay significantly to keep private.

When Litigation Does Not Make Sense

Affirmative litigation is expensive, slow, and uncertain. It does not make sense when:

• The advance was small and the cost of litigation exceeds the realistic recovery.
• Your contract has a true reconciliation that the funder actually honored.
• You signed a clean arbitration clause that strips your ability to litigate publicly.
• You need cash flow this week, not vindication in 18 months.

In most situations, our senior advisors will tell you that direct negotiation, restructuring, or settlement gets you to a better outcome faster than filing a lawsuit. We are not in the business of pushing clients into litigation that does not serve them.

How the Decision Gets Made

The decision to sue is a joint analysis. Our team runs the financial model: what you owe, what you can reasonably negotiate, what a lawsuit costs, what discovery might surface. If the analysis points toward affirmative litigation, we hand the file to an independent attorney from our referral network who specializes in MCA recharacterization or usury cases.

That attorney evaluates the legal merits, files the engagement, and runs the litigation. Our role is to keep the business operating while the engagement proceeds and to manage parallel negotiations with any other funders in your stack.

Delancey Street is a business debt-relief company, not a law firm. When a matter requires legal work, we refer you to an independent attorney from our referral network; the attorney–client relationship is between you and that attorney.

Get a free 30-minute call with a senior advisor →