If you’re reading this, it’s because the math equation has already broken you. You have 1,2, 3,4, or more stacked MCA’s and your daily debits are taking thousand’s of dollars per day, out of your operating account, before the payroll even comes out. You’re rotating cash between banks to keep your doors open, you’re using personal funds, using lines of credit, whatever you can. The funder’s collection desk has your cell number on call, they might have even sent a default letter already, maybe there’s letters being sent to your clients already. That’s why you’re on this page, either already happened, or you suspect it’s going to happen.
You’re here because you’ve got daily debits which are eating your revenue, and someone told you that business debt settlement is the way out. You’re here because now you Google’d it, and you’ve seen the numbers, and you know that having a stack of 3-5 daily MCA debits is unsustainable. You’re here trying to figure out whether calling a funder, and trying to settle, will actually work. It doesn’t, not like that. Before you even think about engaging in business debt settlement, you need to understand what business debt settlement is, what you’re signing up for, and if you’re even a candidate.
Business debt settlement is the process of negotiating those balances down to an amount you can actually afford to pay. The goal is to get a release of your financial obligations, get a release on the UCC liens, etc. The goal is to get into a better situation - where the funder is agreeing to stop collection, drop litigation, and not enforce a COJ. Settlement amounts usually land at a % of the original total owed balance, with punitive fees waived. Unfortunately, business debt settlement can also come with consequences.
What Settlement Actually Means
Settlement means a negotiated agreement. For example, say you owe $487,000 across many MCA’s, and you can’t pay $487,000 then the funders can’t get that either. You can’t pay money you don’t have. They know it, you know it, and once the conversation gets started, they admit it and start realizing that. The settlement is a number where everyone can walk away, safely. For example, the number can be $182,000 over 18 months. It could be a $145,000 in a single lump sum payment. Settlement isn’t a consolidation. In contrast, consolidation is taking on a new loan, larger loan, to pay off the old one, usually at a new APR or factor rate, with the same personal guarantee, and the same daily/weekly payment structure. If you’re already drowning under multiple MCA’s, a fourth one, which is branded as a reverse consolidation, will only drown you further. Many of our clients are here in the first place because of that.
What settlement is not: it’s not bankruptcy. Bankruptcy is a federal process, for example Chapter 7 for liquidation, Chapter 11 for reorganization. Settlement usually happens out of court, between you and creditors, without a trustee, without a public bankruptcy filing for your personal record. For some businesses, bankruptcy is the ideal answer.
What settlement is not: it is not credit repair. Settlement deals with resolving the debt itself. Your personal credit can take a hit, because of how SOME MCA lenders report judgements, tax filings, etc. Bottom line MCA debt is its own animal.
Why MCA Debt Is It’s Own Animal
Most business debt settlement frameworks were built around traditional bank loans, lines of credits, etc. Then MCA’s happened, and rules have changed. MCA is not a loan, it’s a purchase of future receivables. The funders is buying, the right to a % of your future sales at a discount .The structure is specifically setup to sidestep usury laws. It’s a purchase, and not a loan. There’s no interest rate cap. We’ve seen effective APR’s in the range of 100-300% APR. There’s a few things that make an MCA debt, different from a traditional debt. For example, there’s the daily ACH debit. THe funder is going into your account every day, and pulling a fixed amount. When the revenue slips down, the debit doesn’t. That’s something that’s important and where many MCA lenders make a mistake, because it results in a recharacterization of the MCA into a traditional loan.
Another aspect that makes an MCA different, is the UCC-1 filing. The lender records a financing statement with the State, against your business assets, often within 24 hours of the funding call being done. If you have 3-4 MCA’s, then that’s 3-4 UCC-1’s on the same collateral, with seniority to whoever filed first. Another aspect that makes it different is the COJ.
You know what an MCA is. You know settlement = paying less than owed. You know the daily debits are killing you.
Now here’s what actually determines outcomes, and what generic SEO articles won’t tell you.
Settlement Leverage is a multivariable math equation
Everyone talks about negotiation tactics, the hardship letter, the sob story, the payroll. Wrong. Your settlement number is not emotional, it’s a math equation. It’s determined by leverage, negotiation, principal, factor, etc. The actual mechanics really do matter here. MCA funders often borrow money from other lenders, at a syndicated cost basis, on an APR scale - so 10% APR. They then lend it out, at a factor rate of 1.10 to 1.49. The goal of the lender is to pull net IRR in the mid-40’s per transaction. Factor rates of 1.3 to 1.5 produce effective APR’s that run well into the triple digits! They are using institutional debt, in order to get money, and then lend it back out. They’re not often playing with their own money.
Another factor to consider when thinking about business debt settlement is that the recovery rate often drops below 30%, of face value, after 6 months in default. Settlement offers at 30-40% exceed the statistical recovery expectation rate many lenders have. One more thing, most lenders will prefer to get recovered capital because they can re-lend it at a 1.50 factor rate, which allows them to compound gains at that level. Every dollar they are getting back today, is a dollar they can redeploy at a factor rate of 1.50, every 6 months. Time isn’t necessarily on their side either, so they’re motivated to settle in order to get capital back which can be lent out again.
Translation: if you’re negotiating, it’s important to know that the longer it takes the lender to get them oney back, the more money directly, and indirectly, they’re losing. They know what they can, and can’t accept.
Stacking MCA’s creates a multivariable issue for you
Multiple MCA positions on one business can create a prisoner’s dilemna. The funders are very aware of this, and most merchants aren’t. The 4th position funder knows they are a 4th position funder. THey priced that risk in, when they lent you money. When it comes to UCC liens, usually the first to file, equals senior UCC lien holder. 2nd position gets whatever is left, after the first position lender was made whole. The 4th position lender knows they are going to get virtually nothing. Their liens are almost worthless from an enforcement standpoint, because they’re 4th in line. As a result, late position lenders are often eager to settle, if they know they won’t get any money directly. Their settlement appetite can be higher than position 1, due to the fact they don’t expect full compensation due to their junior position in line. The mistake most merchants make is trying to settle position 1 first, because it’s the largest. Position 1 has the cleanest UCC, which means they have the strongest claim on the bank account.
COJ’s are a variable to consider
The 2019 NY amendment ended COJ’s against Non-NY debtors, that are filed in NY courts. The reform was crucial. What didn’t stop is funders who are now rewriting choice of law and venue clauses to PA, Ohio, and Delaware. The reform didn’t kill them, itj ust relocated them. If your contract has a PA venue clause, and a confession executed at signing, the funder can still domesticate the COJ in your home state.