Florida is one of the more favorable states for a business owner facing MCA default. The homestead protection, the absence of in-state confessions of judgment, and the strict rules on out-of-state attorney practice combine to give Florida-based merchants meaningful structural advantages. None of these advantages are automatic. You have to know they exist and use them.
Here is the Florida-specific landscape for MCA default.
Homestead Protection
Florida’s homestead exemption is one of the strongest in the country. Under Article X, Section 4 of the Florida Constitution, your primary residence is protected from forced sale by most creditors, with limited exceptions for tax liens, mortgage debt, and mechanic’s liens.
For MCA default, this matters because most personal guarantees on MCAs cannot reach your Florida homestead. Even if a funder gets a judgment against you personally, they generally cannot force the sale of your home to satisfy it. There are limits on acreage and on how long you must have owned the property, but for most owners with established residences, the protection is robust.
This shifts the negotiation dynamics. If your largest personal asset is shielded, the funder’s leverage to extract a higher settlement from your personal exposure is reduced. Florida-based owners typically settle at the lower end of the typical range, sometimes 30 to 45 cents on the dollar.
No Domestic Confessions of Judgment
Florida does not allow confessions of judgment in standard commercial contracts. Section 55.05 of the Florida Statutes effectively requires a judgment to be obtained through proper litigation. A funder cannot simply file a pre-signed COJ in a Florida court and freeze your accounts overnight.
That said, many MCA contracts contain forum-selection clauses requiring disputes to be litigated in New York or other COJ-friendly jurisdictions. Even if you live and operate in Florida, an MCA contract may force you into New York court, where pre-2019 contracts allowed COJs against out-of-state debtors.
The 2019 New York COJ reform restricted those out-of-state COJ filings, but older contracts may still be enforceable, and some funders structure their newer agreements to use other COJ-friendly states. Read your specific contract carefully.
FL Bar Rule 4-5.5 and Out-of-State Attorneys
Florida Bar Rule 4-5.5 governs the unauthorized practice of law in Florida. Out-of-state attorneys generally cannot practice law in Florida without local admission, pro hac vice authorization, or limited recognized exceptions. This rule has real consequences for MCAn engagements.
Some MCA funders use New York or New Jersey collection attorneys aggressively. Those attorneys may try to contact Florida-based defendants directly. If the contact crosses into the practice of law in Florida, including providing legal advice or threatening legal action without proper Florida authorization, the conduct may violate Rule 4-5.5.
Practical impact: Florida-based business owners facing MCA collection from out-of-state attorneys should consult an independent Florida-licensed attorney early. The attorney can assess whether the opposing counsel’s conduct is within or beyond the bounds of Florida Bar rules, and can use that as a leverage point.
Florida Forum and Florida Defenses
When a Florida-based merchant is sued in Florida court, Florida law provides several defenses that are useful in MCAn engagements. Florida courts have shown willingness in recent years to scrutinize MCA agreements for whether they are truly purchases of receivables or, in substance, disguised loans subject to Florida usury law.
Florida usury law caps interest at 18 percent for most commercial loans up to $500,000, and at 25 percent above that, with criminal usury at 45 percent. If a court recharacterizes an MCA as a loan, the effective rate, often well into triple digits in APR terms, can be a basis for defense.
This is not a defense your relief firm can raise on its own. It is a legal defense that requires an independent Florida-licensed attorney to plead and litigate.
The Settlement Posture in Florida
Given homestead protection, the no-COJ environment, and the Bar Rule constraints on out-of-state attorneys, Florida-based merchants generally negotiate from a stronger position than counterparts in less protective states. Funders know this. Settlement offers from sophisticated funders tend to come in lower, faster, when they realize the defendant is Florida-based with homestead protection and meaningful local legal options.
That said, Florida-based merchants still face daily ACH debits, business credit damage, processor disruption, and the general financial chaos of MCA default. The state advantages are leverage. They are not a substitute for a coherent settlement strategy and, when needed, legal representation.
How to Use the Florida Advantages
If you operate a Florida business, make sure your relief advisor understands the Florida posture. Make sure any attorney referral is to a Florida-licensed attorney, not an out-of-state lawyer who cannot practice in your state. Use the homestead protection in negotiations as a real, documentable limit on what funders can extract from you personally.
Delancey Street is a business debt-relief company, not a law firm. When a matter requires legal work, we refer you to an independent attorney from our referral network; the attorney–client relationship is between you and that attorney.
Get a free 30-minute call with a senior advisor →
Tell us about your situation. A senior advisor, not a sales rep, will review your engagement and respond within 30 minutes with a clear action plan. Free consultation, no obligation.
- Move quickly to stop daily ACH debits where reconciliation rights apply
- Vacate Confessions of Judgment in 72 hours
- Senior advisor, not a salesperson